The Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) viewpoint is widely employed to analyze the training dynamics of overparameterized Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). However, unlike the case of linear Partial Differential Equations (PDEs), we show how the NTK perspective falls short in the nonlinear scenario. Specifically, we establish that the NTK yields a random matrix at initialization that is not constant during training, contrary to conventional belief. Another significant difference from the linear regime is that, even in the idealistic infinite-width limit, the Hessian does not vanish and hence it cannot be disregarded during training. We explore the convergence guarantees of such methods in both linear and nonlinear cases, addressing challenges such as spectral bias and slow convergence. Every theoretical result is supported by numerical examples with both linear and nonlinear PDEs, and we highlight the benefits of second-order methods in benchmark test cases.

The Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) viewpoint represents a valuable approach to examine the training dynamics of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) in the infinite width limit. We leverage this perspective and focus on the case of nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) solved by PINNs. We provide theoretical results on the different behaviors of the NTK depending on the linearity of the differential operator. Moreover, inspired by our theoretical results, we emphasize the advantage of employing second-order methods for training PINNs. Additionally, we explore the convergence capabilities of second-order methods and address the challenges of spectral bias and slow convergence. Every theoretical result is supported by numerical examples with both linear and nonlinear PDEs, and we validate our training method on benchmark test cases.